<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>violence</title>
    <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1488</link>
    <description>Entrées d’index</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Ovid’s Amores 2.8: A Genuine Offence</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1536</link>
      <description>In this article, I provide a close examination of Ovid’s Amores 2.8 that focuses on how the poet-lover’s use of persuasory rhetoric enables him to bully and silence the subaltern Cypassis. My discussion challenges Patricia Watson’s claim (in “Ovid Amores 2.7 and 8: The Disingenuous Defence”) that this poem has comparably less forensic qualities and rhetorical elements than its counterpart (2.7). I argue that forensic and rhetorical elements permeate the text and become increasingly blatant as the poem proceeds. By employing declamatory and oratorical techniques, the poet-lover weaponises his rhetorical education, a privilege afforded to him by his status as an elite Roman male, in order to intimidate, manipulate, and ultimately blackmail Cypassis, the uneducated, defenceless, and mute subaltern. I suggest that it is a mischaracterisation to refer to this approach as a ‘seduction’; it is a calculated exertion of power that enacts gendered violence.  </description>
      <pubDate>lun., 27 mai 2024 11:58:46 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>jeu., 19 déc. 2024 18:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1536</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nocet esse feracem: An Ecofeminist Analysis of the Pseudo-Ovidian Nux</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1485</link>
      <description>The Nux depicts the complaints of a walnut tree, pelted with stones and beaten with rods when she bears fruit. Discussion of the Nux, however, has largely centred on its authorship. Recognising its deep engagement with Ovid’s work, this article sets aside the question of authorship and takes a critical ecofeminist approach to explore the poem’s concerns with fertility, nature, the female, and violence. It argues that the walnut tree is feminised and humanised so that her complaints that fertility brings pain and her criticism of trees who sabotage their fertility to be beautiful have meaning for Roman women, and in particular for those women living under the Principate. It aims to demonstrate that the Nux figures the domination of nature and the oppression of women as outcomes of the same harmful ideology. </description>
      <pubDate>jeu., 04 janv. 2024 11:20:41 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>mer., 17 janv. 2024 09:13:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>