<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>manumission</title>
    <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/236</link>
    <description>Entrées d’index</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>The Erotics of Manumussion: Prostitutes and the πρᾶσις ἐπ’ ἐλευθερίᾳ</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/832</link>
      <description>This paper explores evidence for third party manumissions, indicated in the sources by forms of λυέσθαι and λυτρώσασθαι. It considers the procedure followed and the legal status of slaves freed in this manner, but the focus is on conceptions of this method of manumission and social mentalities toward it. The paper concludes that this practice was an informal procedure of manumission used to free prostitutes. Oratory and comedy employ it as an example of youthful extravagance and to comment on an opponent’s negative mental state. It also highlights a common stereotype of prostitutes as manipulative and scheming. While the procedure of third party manumission supports arguments for different classes of freed slaves, it also questions the idea that masters imposed formal conditions on the freedom of ex-slaves in classical Athens. </description>
      <pubDate>mar., 14 juin 2022 10:14:10 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>mer., 18 oct. 2023 11:22:55 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/832</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Homo inter homines sum – The importance of age for freedmen’s construction of masculinity in Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/226</link>
      <description>May the bones of my patron rest well; he wanted me to be a man among men, (Patrono meo ossa bene quiescant, qui me hominem inter homines voluit esse), Petron. Sat. 39.4. These are the words of the famous freedman Trimalchio, expressing that he is now able to enjoy the good life and that he is part of society, he is “a man among men”. But what does this “a man among men” mean and why was it important for a freedman to be seen as a man? In the Greco-Roman world the slave was seen as a boy and manumission was perceived as a maturity process, where the manumitted slave could be seen as coming of age. This article examines how age can be used as a means to study how Roman male freedmen were positioned in relation to the ideal Roman masculinity and how this positioning can be seen as an expression of (gender) identity and status. The article addresses these questions by doing a critical close reading of a sample of Late Republican and Early Imperial Roman textual, iconographic and epigraphic sources, applying masculinity theory and drawing on modern conceptions and constructions of masculinity. As a key concept to discuss the material, Connell’s concept “hegemonic masculinity”, as an ideal and normative masculinity, is used. The article provides conclusions on why age was important for Roman freedmen. It is also pointed out that, as a phenomenon, Roman freedmen are interesting when studying intersections of age and gender, because they illustrate the way age can be perceived as a social category. </description>
      <pubDate>mar., 14 juin 2022 08:35:31 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>ven., 24 mars 2023 10:47:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>