<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Pericles</title>
    <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/744</link>
    <description>Entrées d’index</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>A Feminist Abolitionist reads Plutarch, Euripides, and Plato: Periclean Athens and Nineteenth Century America in Lydia Maria Child’s Philothea</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1449</link>
      <description>In writing her 1836 novel Philothea, the abolitionist Lydia Maria Child drew on careful reading of Plutarch’s Life of Pericles, Euripides’ Ion, and Plato’s Republic. The novel’s plot, organized around Pericles’ law that both parents must be Athenian citizens for their child to have citizenship, shares features with arguments for the abolition of slavery and for women’s rights that Child made in other writings throughout her lifetime. Child combined a sentimental romance narrative about an enslaved woman that encourages readers to become abolitionists with allusions to Plato’s Republic that affirm the abolitionist conviction that slavery is absolutely unjust. Previous scholarship has treated Child’s use of Greek material in a rather general way. This article demonstrates just how precisely she incorporated elements of Plutarch, Euripides and Plato into the abolitionist story she chose to tell. By expanding understanding of Child’s engagement with the classical past that her gender kept her from learning about in a university setting, this study also contributes to the growing body of knowledge about how women did get access to — and put to use — classical learning.  </description>
      <pubDate>jeu., 04 janv. 2024 11:19:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>jeu., 18 janv. 2024 09:55:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1449</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Courtesans Reconsidered: Women in Aristophanes’ Lysistrata</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/735</link>
      <description>This essay provides a reassessment of the view that the young wives of Aristophanes’ Lysistrata are modeled on hetaeras. It begins by examining a parallel debate in contemporary Attic red-figure vase paintings of women at home to show that displays of female sexuality are not incompatible with marriageable maidens and free citizen wives. Aristophanes similarly situates his female characters within a domestic context as the site of sexual and social legitimacy. A detailed analysis of clothing, footwear and grooming practices deployed in the sex strike demonstrates that they represent the standard accoutrements of housewives rather than of hetaeras. Their domesticated eroticism, while enabling the male spectators a voyeuristic glimpse of other men’s wives, reinforces their procreative function as mothers and producers of future Athenian citizens. The importance of sexual desire within marriage for the production of legitimate offspring is dramatically reinforced by the onstage presence of the boy child in the thwarted sexual encounter of Myrrhine and Cinesias. Aristophanes’ Lysistrata fits with a pattern of heightened interest in women and domestic ideology at the end of the fifth century BCE. The centrality of marriage in the play may represent a response to the erosion of Pericles' citizenship law in response to the depletion of Athenian men in the waning years of the Peloponnesian war. </description>
      <pubDate>mar., 14 juin 2022 09:11:54 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>mer., 18 oct. 2023 11:45:15 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>