<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Achilles</title>
    <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/779</link>
    <description>Entrées d’index</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>“Simone Weil’s Iliad : Misunderstanding Homer ?”</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1497</link>
      <description>This article focuses on Simone Weil’s translation and reception of Homer’s Iliad. Some criitics have called it a misreading, but I contend that translation and reception comes in many forms and that it is a mistake to label non-literal translations as “misreadings.” My analysis of Weil’s Homer also focuses on how Weil’s writing about war is marked by her identity as a woman and a woman who is drawn to epic poetry. The article focuses on two episodes in the Iliad: Priam and Achilles in Book 24 and Lycaon and Achilles in Book 21. </description>
      <pubDate>jeu., 04 janv. 2024 11:23:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>mer., 17 janv. 2024 10:08:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1497</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preposterous Poetics and the Erotics of Death</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/774</link>
      <description>“Preposterous Poetics and the Erotics of Death” looks at two crucial issues of late antique poetics and the representation of gender through the Dionysiaca of Nonnus. First, it discusses how Nonnus constructs a narrative which links mythic stories in a willfully confused chronological patterning, which allows events in the future of narrative time to bear on the current story-telling. This is explored both in its aesthetics of exemplarity and in its theological understanding of narrative time. “Preposterous” is understood thus in its etymological sense of the confusion of the “pre-” and the “post-”. Second, this article explores through such a model of poetics how Nonnus represents a bizarre and un-paralleled scene of necrophiliac desire on the battle-field. On the one hand, this disturbing scene of corrupt erotic desire in action is expressed through the model of Achilles and Penthesileia (an event far in the future for the time of the Dionysiaca); on the other hand, it utilizes a strange narrative technique of the narrator describing the scene, followed immediately by the desire-stuck soldier also describing the scene from another perspective. The article explores how this doubled representation opens a question – a question that goes to the heart of late antique poetics – of what it means to repeat, to paraphrase, to rehearse the inherited language of classical, epic sexual desire in the new world of the Christian empire. </description>
      <pubDate>mar., 14 juin 2022 09:13:37 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>lun., 16 oct. 2023 14:29:04 +0200</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>