<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Auteurs : Judith P. Hallett</title>
    <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/988</link>
    <description>Publications de Auteurs Judith P. Hallett</description>
    <language>fr</language>
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Scenarios of Sulpiciae: moral discourses and immoral verses</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1121</link>
      <description>This discussion examines literary depictions of several Roman women who shared a name, and presumably membership in the same aristocratic family, with the Augustan elegist Sulpicia: by Livy in 39.8-10, in his account of the Bacchanalian conspiracy in 186 BCE; by Valerius Maximus, in an episode dated to 43/42 BCE that is also related by Appian at BC 4.39; and by Valerius Maximus again at 8.15.12, in an episode dated to the third century BCE that is also related in part by the elder Pliny in NH 7.120, and treated by Ovid at Fasti 2.157-160. It considers how these scenarios featuring these other Sulpiciae, mostly by authors with a moralizing message, help to contextualize the eleven Sulpicia elegies and their later Roman reception. It also considers why Ovid, who seems to have known Sulpicia and her work, never refers to a contemporary female elegist of this name. </description>
      <pubDate>lun., 20 juin 2022 10:33:55 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>mer., 08 mars 2023 10:25:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/1121</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intersections of Gender and Genre: Sexualizing the Puella in Roman comedy, lyric and elegy</title>
      <link>https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/983</link>
      <description>My paper examines the use of the Latin diminutive noun puella, literally meaning “sexually immature” young girl, in Roman comedy, lyric and elegy. It considers how and why Catullus, Horace and the Augustan love elegists employed this noun for mature women they depict as sexually active and emotionally valued. Its analysis builds upon and critiques two earlier linguistic studies: one on the nouns puella and virgo, the other on puella as a term for “prostitute”. By so doing, it argues for the importance of analyzing Latin texts concerned with gender issues through traditional philological as well as innovative theoretical lenses. </description>
      <pubDate>mar., 14 juin 2022 15:42:56 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>jeu., 09 mars 2023 16:13:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.peren-revues.fr/eugesta/983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>