https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1624 Entrées d’index fr 0 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1622 This text aims to show that the permanence and transversality of the figure of the poet in the works of Søren Kierkegaard can lead to a poetics of testimony. This poetics constitutes the very culmination of Kierkegaardian thought of truth considered in the light of the paradox. It also comes to manifest at the same time the irreducible aporia to which the possibility of its expression leads : even expressed poetically, the passion of existence for paradox can only confront thought with that which absolutely resists it. sam., 17 janv. 2026 20:44:18 +0100 jeu., 29 janv. 2026 22:59:11 +0100 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1622 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1628 In Kierkegaard’s thought, Job emerges as a figure where faith and despair converge, and where the suspension of ethics becomes the suspension of meaning itself. Through a chronological and conceptual reading of Kierkegaard’s published and unpublished writings, this article reconsiders Job not as a mere religious archetype but as the emblem of an ethics of silence: a place where truth no longer argues but endures, manifesting itself as pure exposure to the divine and to the limits of human understanding. sam., 17 janv. 2026 20:55:08 +0100 dim., 18 janv. 2026 21:54:19 +0100 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1628 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1684 This essay aims to place Kierkegaard’s philosophy in the context of destitution, tracing the idea of the temporality of the event, through the concept of “moment” as it is thought in Philosophical Fragments (1844). In Philosophical Fragments, through the category of moment, the unprecedented status – anti-philosophical and anti-dialectical status – of Kierkegaard’s concept of truth arises. Indeed, the moment is not the place where truth become, but that one in which it happens. dim., 18 janv. 2026 19:28:42 +0100 dim., 18 janv. 2026 19:29:27 +0100 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1684 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1640 This article offers a rereading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work through the lens of what we call an aesthetics of effacement, understood as a strategy for putting the speaking subject and its claim to truth into crisis. In contrast to systematic philosophy, which authorizes discourse through a stable and transparent subject, Kierkegaard deploys a plurality of pseudonyms, discursive registers, and literary forms that deconstruct the unity of the author and disorient the reader. Far from being a mere stylistic device, this structure responds to an ethical demand: to make thought an existential experience, where truth can only be expressed indirectly—through the withdrawal of the subject and the suspension of any doctrinal authority. Using a hermeneutical method inspired by existential phenomenology and deconstruction (notably through Derrida and Levinas), the analysis focuses on The Sickness Unto Death, Fear and Trembling, and The Concept of Anxiety. These texts illustrate how Kierkegaard conceives existence as a dispossession of the self and speech as a tension between silence and truth. The result is a radical redefinition of philosophy—not as the discourse of truth spoken by a grounded subject, but as the shaping of a lived, fragmentary, and anonymous truth that escapes both speaker and listener.- sam., 17 janv. 2026 21:09:08 +0100 sam., 17 janv. 2026 21:09:08 +0100 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1640