https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1649 Entrées d’index fr 0 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1644 This essay examines Kierkegaard’s indirect communication as a destitution of the subject. Through pseudonymous multiplication and the figure of the spy, it shows how even “S. Kierkegaard” functions as a pseudonym. The temporal paradox of writing – one cannot begin nor finish – reveals subjectivity’s structural instability. Adorno’s materialist reading exposes this as alienated interiority. The analysis concludes with Bernhard’s Correction, where catastrophic collapse replaces redemptive possibility. sam., 17 janv. 2026 21:15:19 +0100 sam., 17 janv. 2026 21:15:19 +0100 https://www.peren-revues.fr/revue-k/1644